What if I Cannot Afford Treatment that Would Allow Me to Work?

Byron David, Conway, FlorenceWhat if you are disabled and unable to work?

You would file for Social Security Disability Income (SSDI) benefits.  Sounds simple enough.

Now let us consider another – more complicated – question.

What if there was a treatment for your disability which would allow you to work, BUT you cannot afford that treatment?

Can your SSDI claim be denied based on the fact that, with treatment, you could work?

Consider this case:

A young man had a below-the-knee amputation over 15 years ago, and began using a prosthetic leg that same year.  He used that same artificial limb for several years, before it began cracking and causing his stump to bleed when worn for more than 30 minutes at a time.  The man is unable to get around on one leg.  However, he cannot afford a new limb and there are no assistance programs available to him for reduced or free repair or replacement of the limb.  Modifications to the device itself have been tried, but to no avail.

When filing for SSDI, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), the medical expert (ME), and even the prosthetic provider, testified that the man cannot ambulate properly with his current prosthetic leg, and that he needs a new one.  Furthermore, all agree that with a new leg, the claimant would be able to get around easily and, therefore could secure a job.

The question is then, can the man’s SSDI claim be denied based on the fact that, with treatment (which he cannot afford), he could work?

No, according to Attorney Byron David.  David’s opinion is based on rulings in two prior cases:

  • “The medicine or treatment an indigent person cannot afford is no more a cure for his condition than if it had never been discovered.”   [McKnight v. Sullivan,927 F.2d 241 (6th Cir. 1990) which adopted the 5th Circuit rule in Lovelace v. Bowen, 813 F.2d 55 (5thCir. 1987)]
  • A claimant may not be penalized for failing to seek treatment she cannot afford; “[i]t flies in the face of the patent purposes of the Social Security Act to deny benefits to someone because he is too poor to obtain medical treatment that may help him.” [Gordon v. Schweiker, 725 F.2d 231, 237 (4th Cir.1984).  Lovejoy v. Heckler, 790 F.2d 1114, 1117 (4th Cir. 1986)]

If you or someone you know are disabled and unable to work, please contact The David Law Firm at (843) 488-1415.

Advertisements

Posted on January 6, 2014, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: